Palliative Care and End-of-Life Care: PI 04-Proportion of unstable palliative care phases that last 3 days or less, 2021
Indicator Attributes
Identifying and definitional attributes | |
Metadata item type: | Indicator |
---|---|
Indicator type: | Indicator |
Short name: | PI 04-Proportion of unstable palliative care phases that last 3 days or less, 2021 |
Synonymous names: | Time in the unstable phase (PCOC) |
METEOR identifier: | 742668 |
Registration status: | Health!, Qualified 21/10/2021 |
Description: | Percentage of all unstable palliative care phases that last 3 days or less. An unstable palliative care phase commences when an urgent change in the care plan or emergency treatment is required. It ends when the care plan is in place and it has been reviewed for effectiveness, or when the patient's death is likely to occur within days (see below for further details). |
Rationale: | The National Palliative Care Strategy 2018 (DoH 2019) states that quality of care should be routinely monitored in order for care to be assessed and improved across all care settings. In particular, Goal 3 - Access and Choice, was established to ensure "People affected by life-limiting illnesses receive care that matches their needs and preferences." Timely resolution of patients' urgent needs as measured by this indicator, may be indicative of the quality of care received according to the needs of the patient. A palliative care phase is used to describe the care needs of patients and their families, and to indicate whether or not the current care plan meets these needs. The 4 palliative care phase types are: stable, unstable, deteriorating, terminal. The unstable phase type alerts clinical staff to the need for urgent changes to the patient’s care plan or that emergency intervention is required. Once assigned, and with the new care plan in place, the clinical team monitor for improvements in the patient and/or family/carer condition. This does not necessarily mean that the symptom/crisis has been fully resolved. However, with the new care plan initiated and reviewed for effectiveness, the patient/family/carer can be moved out of the unstable phase into another relevant phase (AIHW 2021). The 3-day timeframe was chosen to represent best clinical practice (PCOC 2012a). |
Indicator set: | Palliative Care and End-of-Life Care Key Performance Indicators 2021 Health!, Qualified 21/10/2021 |
Collection and usage attributes | |
Computation description: | Coverage/scope: Palliative care services contributing to the Palliative Care Outcomes Collaboration (PCOC). The PCOC is a national program that aims to systematically drive improvements in patient and carer outcomes, using standardised validated clinical assessment tools to benchmark and measure outcomes in palliative care. Participation in the PCOC is voluntary and open to all palliative care service providers across Australia. Contirbution to the collection is sought from services in:
Methodology:
Presented as a percentage. |
---|---|
Computation: | (Numerator ÷ Denominator) x 100 |
Numerator: | Number of unstable palliative care phases lasting for 3 days or less within the reference period. |
Numerator data elements: | |
Denominator: | Total number of unstable palliative care phases within the reference period. |
Denominator data elements: | |
Disaggregation: | Service attributes:
|
Disaggregation data elements: | |
Comments: | Reference period for 2021 reporting: 2020. |
Representational attributes | |
Representation class: | Percentage |
Data type: | Real |
Unit of measure: | Phase of care |
Format: | N[NN]{.N[N]} |
Indicator conceptual framework | |
Framework and dimensions: | 1. Effectiveness |
Accountability attributes | |
Organisation responsible for providing data: | Palliative Care Outcomes Collaboration (PCOC) |
Other issues caveats: | Data for this indicator is sourced from PCOC. PCOC’s national longitudinal database was established in 2005, and in 2021 consists of more than 300,000 patients and greater than 1 million palliative care phases provided within hospitals, patients’ homes and in residential aged care facilities. The number of services reporting palliative care patient outcome data increased from 127 services in 2009 to 188 services in 2019, with most specialist palliative care providers within Australia participating in this voluntary national program. PCOC has a set of rule checks and flags that ensure consistency of data entry at the point of collection by trained staff from participating services, and also comprehensive data quality checks at the point of data entry, data receipt and prior to data analysis (Woods et al. 2021). Limited missing data values are evident (i.e. <4% per item) (Daveson et al. 2021). Participation in PCOC is voluntary and open to all palliative care service providers across Australia. The data are administrative and embedded into routine clinical practice. |
Source and reference attributes | |
Submitting organisation: | Australian Institute of Health and Welfare on behalf of the Palliative Care and End-of-Life Care Data Development Working Group |
Reference documents: | AIHW (Australian Institute of Health and Welfare). Palliative Care Services in Australia: Palliative care outcomes. Canberra: AIHW. Viewed 9 June 2021, https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/ Daveson BA, Allingham SF, Clapham S, Johnson CE, Currow DC, Yates P, et al. 2021. The PCOC Symptom Assessment Scale (SAS): A valid measure for daily use at point of care and in palliative care programs. PLoS ONE 16(3): e0247250. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247250 DoH (Department of Health) 2019. National Palliative Care Strategy 2018. Canberra: DoH. Viewed 9 June 2021, https://www.health.gov.au/resources/ PCOC (Palliative Care Outcomes Collaboration) 2012a Time in the unstable phase – revised benchmark. Viewed 17 August 2021, https://documents.uow.edu.au/content/groups/public/ PCOC November 2012b. PCOC Version 3.0 Dataset: Data Dictionary and Technical Guidelines (version 1.2.0). Viewed 9 June 2021, https://documents.uow.edu.au/content/groups/public/ Woods JA, Johnson CE, Allingham SF, Ngo HT, Katzenellenbogen JM, Thompson SC 2021. Collaborative data familiarisation and quality assessment: Reflections from use of a national dataset to investigate palliative care for Indigenous Australians. Health Inf Manag; 50(1-2):64-75. doi: 10.1177/1833358320908957. |